A11-240 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brandon Dominic Cox, Appellant.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to give an accomplice liability instruction to the jury because the defendant failed to present sufficient evidence that the alleged accomplice could have been indicted and convicted of the same crime as the defendant.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when, after receiving a note from the jury indicating that it may become deadlocked, the court instructed the jury to continue deliberation because the jury was not currently deadlocked and the court did not coerce the jury to reach a unanimous verdict.
The district court erred when it convicted the defendant of both first-degree felony murder and second-degree intentional murder because under Minn. Stat. § 609.04, subd. 1 (2010), second-degree intentional murder is a lesser-included offense of first-degree felony murder and a defendant cannot be convicted of both offenses.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part. Justice Paul H. Anderson.
By: Landon J. Ascheman, Esq.
(B) 612.217.0077 (C) 651.280.9533
Fri, January 25, 2019 @ 11:01 AM
Thu, February 14, 2019 @ 2:49 AM
Sat, February 23, 2019 @ 3:36 AM
Mon, March 4, 2019 @ 11:10 AM
Fri, March 8, 2019 @ 3:02 PM
Tue, June 4, 2019 @ 7:12 AM
Sat, June 8, 2019 @ 5:08 AM
Wed, June 12, 2019 @ 7:15 AM
Tue, July 30, 2019 @ 9:38 AM
Thu, November 14, 2019 @ 9:01 PM
Your Email/URL (Optional):
Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.
©2019 Ascheman Law | 612-217-0077. Website Design by Lift Creative.