New Statute - EVIDENCE OF VIDEOTAPES, AUDIOTAPES, OR OTHER RECORDINGS.

New Statute - EVIDENCE OF VIDEOTAPES, AUDIOTAPES, OR OTHER RECORDINGS.

Effective July 1, 2010, a new Minnesota Statute goes into effect.  (See the Statute below).  This Statute holds that in any criminal proceeding, petty misdemeanor, or civil license forfeiture the Police are no longer required to provide transcripts of any video, audio, or other recording.

Previously, the State was required to provide this evidence to show what they will be using against an individual charged with a criminal offense and on what grounds.  This seems to be targeted at DWI/DUI offenses since these cases tend to involve transcripts most often.

This is a significant change and will make it more difficult for many defendants to be able to obtain quality representation in these hearings.  Having an audio transcript makes it much more likely that issues will be identified by the average attorney.  Without audio transcripts it is increasingly important to find a quality criminal defense attorney that will be able to review these recordings and identify all the issues in your case.

ASCHEMAN & SMITH, LLC

Landon J. Ascheman, Esq.
500 Laurel Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102

Landon@AschemanSmith.com
(B) 612.217.0077 (C) 651.280.9533 (F) 651.344.0700

Contact Me: FB - Twitter - LinkedIn - Website - Blog

P.S. Have an attorney in your phone? Add us now 612-217-0077 - While we hope you never need us, we're here if you do.

We work in many different practice areas, including: Criminal Defense, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Appellate Practice, Arbitration, Assault, Assault and Battery, Burglary, Business Crimes, Capital Offenses, Child Abduction, Child Abuse and Neglect, Child Sexual Abuse, Civil Forfeiture, Constitutional Law, Controlled Substances Law, Corrections Law, Crime Victims Compensation, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Conspiracy, Criminal Forfeiture, Criminal Fraud, Criminal Investigation, Criminal Law, Criminal Prosecution, Death Penalty, Defense Litigation, Domestic Abuse, Drivers License Suspension, Driving While Intoxicated, Drug Crimes, Drug Forfeiture, Drug Trafficking, Drugs and Narcotics, DUI/DWI, Electronic Surveillance, Embezzlement, Excessive Use of Force, Expungements, Extortion, Extradition, False Arrest, False Imprisonment, Felonies, Fifth Amendment Law, First Amendment Law, Forgery, Fourth Amendment Law, Freedom of Religion, General Practice, Governmental Law, Grand Jury Practice, Gross Misdemeanor, High Speed Police Pursuit Litigation, Hit and Run, Homicide, International Criminal Law, International Extradition, International Law, Internet Crimes, Internet Law, Internet Litigation, Juvenile Criminal Law, Juvenile Delinquency, Kidnapping, Law Enforcement, Litigation, Local Government Law, Mail Fraud, Malicious Prosecution, Manslaughter, Maritime Criminal Law, Mediation., Methamphetamine Crimes, Military Courts Martial, Military Criminal Law, Military Justice, Military Law, Misdemeanors, Money Laundering, Murder, Parole and Probation, Petty MisdemeanorsPolice Brutality, Police Misconduct, Post-Conviction Remedies, Prisoners Rights, Proceedings, Restraining Orders, Search and Seizure, Sex Crimes, Sexual Assault, Shoplifting, Stalking, State Government Law, Theft, Township Law, Traffic Violations, Trial Practice, Vehicular Homicide, Victims Rights, Weapons Charges, White Collar Crime, White Collar Criminal Defense, White Collar Fraud, Wire Fraud, Wiretapping.


CHAPTER 231--H.F.No. 212
An act
relating to courts; eliminating the prerequisite of pretrial filing of a
transcript for admission into evidence of law enforcement vehicle recordings;
proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 634.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1.[634.36] EVIDENCE OF VIDEOTAPES, AUDIOTAPES, OR OTHER
RECORDINGS.
In any hearing or trial of a criminal offense or petty misdemeanor or proceeding
pursuant to section 169A.53, subdivision 3, evidence of a videotape, audiotape, or
electronic or digital recording prepared by a peace officer, using recording equipment in a
law enforcement vehicle, while in the performance of official duties shall not be excluded
on the ground that a written transcript of the recording was not prepared and available at
or prior to trial. As used in this section, "peace officer" has the meaning given in section
169A.03, subdivision 18.
EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective July 1, 2010, and applies to trials and
hearings beginning on or after that date.

No comments (Add your own)

Add a New Comment


code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.